Case studies, five projects bringing 3D printing into industry

These are five real projects in which 3D printing solved a specific technical problem in industry. In them I established stable processes, improved maintenance operations, accelerated product development and enabled companies to adopt 3D printing as a tool that delivers results. The biggest time savings came in maintenance and product development. A spare part for a production line arrived in 24 to 48 hours instead of 4 to 6 weeks, and an iteration of a bracket in pump development took one day instead of 2 to 3 weeks.

The common thread is not the machine itself. The result came from choosing the right technology for each part, from validated profiles and from clear procedures the team can repeat. The focus is on practice, processes and outcomes.

Client Industry Problem Technology Result
IGM Mladost d.o.o. Roof tile production, maintenance A machine spare part took 4 to 6 weeks to arrive FFF, PPS CF, 3D scanning 24 to 48 hours per part
3Lateral / Epic Games Novi Sad Games and film, motion capture CNC iterations slow, standard FFF not precise enough FFF, SLA, SLS, CNC First iteration in 2 to 3 days instead of 2 to 3 weeks
Faculty of Technical Sciences Novi Sad Education and research, Interreg Danube Laboratories used different methods, inconsistent results FFF, SLA, SLS Unified methodology and predictable work
Aumovio Serbia Automotive electronics, displays Housings and mounts must withstand vibration and heat, and iterations must be fast FFF, SLS The system can be improved within one day
Grundfos Srbija d.o.o. Pumps, product development Metal motor brackets too slow for a phase where the design keeps changing FFF, PPS CF 1 day per iteration instead of 2 to 3 weeks

Lead time of a part or iteration before and after introducing 3D printing in three projects

IGM Mladost d.o.o.

Original industrial part and PPS CF replacement part for IGM Mladost

IGM Mladost, spare parts for a roof tile production line

Client

IGM Mladost d.o.o. manufactures roof tiles. The project is in maintenance, specifically producing spare parts for industrial machines on the production line.

Challenge

The standard process for a spare part went like this: measurement, 2D drawings, tooling order and production. The whole cycle took 4 to 6 weeks. For critical parts subject to frequent wear, that is too slow.

Solution

We started from the existing, worn metal part. We did reverse engineering, meaning 3D scanning the part and building a 3D model from the scan. Then we optimized the geometry for additive manufacturing and produced the part with FFF technology in PPS CF. The new part is dark grey, with a visible carbon fiber texture.

Technologies

  • 3D scanning and reverse engineering
  • FFF, printing by melting filament layer by layer
  • PPS CF, polyphenylene sulfide filled with chopped carbon fibers. This is not CFF, where a continuous fiber is laid into the part.

Result

Metric Before After
Delivery time 4 to 6 weeks 24 to 48 hours
Cost per part €800 to 1,200 €45 to 80
Minimum quantity 10 to 50 pcs 1 pc
Part weight 100% (metal) about 60% (PPS CF)
Iteration time more than 6 weeks 1 to 2 days

What other companies can take from this

PPS CF as a metal substitute works when the part is not exposed to extreme mechanical loads. For such parts the savings in time and cost are dramatic. The first step is to list the maintenance parts that wear often and take weeks to arrive. I write more about scanning as an entry point in reverse engineering and 3D scanning as an entry point to additive manufacturing, and about material choice in how to choose the right material without guessing.

3Lateral / Epic Games Novi Sad

Motion capture camera mount developed for 3Lateral and Epic Games

3Lateral / Epic Games Novi Sad, motion capture camera mount

Client

3Lateral is a Novi Sad studio specialized in digital humans, meaning scanning, modeling and facial animation for games and film. Epic Games, the company behind Unreal Engine, acquired 3Lateral in January 2019.

Challenge

Motion capture records an actor's movement so it can be transferred to a digital character. It needs precise, lightweight mounts and adapters that fit different cameras and markers. A typical example is the helmet camera mount, a thin boom arm that holds a small camera in front of the actor's face. Standard CNC machining was slow for iterations. Standard FFF lacked sufficient precision.

Solution

We set up a hybrid approach, where each technology does what it does best:

  • FFF for rapid iteration and low cost prototypes
  • SLA, printing from liquid resin cured by light, for high precision and smooth surfaces
  • SLS, laser sintering of powder, for functional parts and mechanical strength
  • CNC for critical surfaces and tolerances

Technologies

FFF, SLA, SLS and CNC machining.

Result

Metric Before (CNC only) After (hybrid approach)
First iteration 2 to 3 weeks 2 to 3 days
Prototype cost €200 to 500 €15 to 80
Iterations per month 1 4 to 6
Mount weight 100% (aluminum) 40 to 70%
Concepts tested 1 to 2 per project 8 to 10 per project

What other companies can take from this

The hybrid approach lets you test several concepts quickly before you finalize one. That was critical for development in the games and film industry, and the same holds for any development where the design changes faster than a CNC shop can respond. You do not pick one technology for the whole part, you pick the right technology for each phase and each surface.

Faculty of Technical Sciences Novi Sad (Interreg Danube)

Professor Movrin holding a 3D-printed lattice structure in the Faculty of Technical Sciences Novi Sad laboratory

Faculty of Technical Sciences Novi Sad, a unified methodology for laboratories

Client

The Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, within the Danube DNA project (Digital Transformation Network of Active SMEs Training and Knowledge Transfer Centers) of the Interreg Danube programme. The project runs from January 2024 to June 2026, is led by the University of Novi Sad with partners from 12 Danube Region countries, and has a budget of about 2.16 million euros, 80 percent of it from Interreg funds. Its goal is a network of regional training and knowledge transfer centers that help small and medium companies with digital transformation toward Industry 4.0. Within that framework, Professor Movrin is developing a regional competence center that connects industry, research and education.

Challenge

Different laboratories worked with different methods. Results were inconsistent. Failed prints and project delays were common.

Solution

We introduced an industrial workflow:

  • standards for all materials
  • moisture and storage control for materials
  • profile validation for FFF, SLA and SLS
  • consistent quality control
  • documentation for students, assistants and researchers

The competence center thus received a unified methodology. Laboratories now operate predictably and without major deviations.

Technologies

FFF, SLA and SLS, with validated profiles for each.

Result

  • Projects are completed faster.
  • Results are consistent.
  • Students and researchers have clear working procedures.

What other companies can take from this

Companies with several machines or several sites have the same problem. Without shared profiles and procedures everyone works their own way, and results cannot be compared. For the region it also matters that it gains a generation of engineers who understand what an industrial process looks like, not hobby use. I explain why manufacturer profiles are not enough in why factory profiles are not enough for serious work.

Aumovio Serbia

Aumovio automotive display with a 3D-printed housing, mount and test module

Aumovio Serbia, housings and mounts for automotive displays

Client

Aumovio Serbia from Novi Sad, formerly part of Continental. Aumovio was created as the spin off of Continental's automotive business and has been an independent company listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange since 18 September 2025. In Novi Sad it has a research and development center and a plant for displays and instrument clusters. The company develops modules and displays for automotive systems and has used consulting support from day one.

Challenge

Housings, mounts and electronic elements must be precise, stable and durable enough to withstand vibration and heat. Iterations must be fast.

Solution

We set up a process that combines FFF and SLS depending on requirements:

  • FFF for stable functional parts
  • SLS for complex geometries
  • standardized profiles for strength and dimensional stability
  • rapid iterations for testing different module versions

Custom housings, mounts and test modules were developed that allow fast design changes. The complete system can be iteratively improved within one day.

Technologies

FFF and SLS, with standardized profiles.

Result

  • Product development accelerated.
  • Module precision improved.
  • Dependency on external procurement reduced.

What other companies can take from this

Automotive electronics gains a tool for rapid validation of product generations in the early development phase. The key is not one machine, it is standardized profiles and a clear rule for which technology goes on which part. I describe how such a process is verified in what process qualification looks like in practice.

Grundfos Srbija d.o.o.

Grundfos pump with an electric-motor mount prototype in a development lab

Grundfos Srbija, electric motor brackets in pump development

Client

Grundfos Srbija d.o.o., pump industry. The project is in the product development phase.

Challenge

During the development of new pumps, different electric motor bracket configurations need to be tested. Standard metal production required tooling orders and CNC machining. That is too slow for a phase where the design changes every few days.

Solution

During development and validation we replaced the metal brackets with PPS CF brackets. Iterations are printed overnight and tested the next day.

Technologies

FFF and PPS CF, polyphenylene sulfide filled with chopped carbon fibers.

Result

Metric Before (metal and CNC) After (PPS CF)
Iteration time 2 to 3 weeks 1 day
Cost per iteration €300 to 600 €20 to 40
Iterations per week 0.3 3 to 5
Time to design freeze 3 to 4 months 3 to 4 weeks
Development phase cost €8,000 to 15,000 €800 to 2,000

What other companies can take from this

In the development phase, iteration speed matters more than final material properties. PPS CF enables functional testing before moving to metal serial production. The serial part can still be metal, but you reach the final design in weeks, not months.

Frequently asked questions

Are these real projects?

Yes. All five examples are real projects with named clients, and the numbers in the tables come from those projects. For a different part and a different company the numbers will differ, so every case should be checked on its own.

When can PPS CF replace a metal part?

When the part is not exposed to extreme mechanical loads. In the IGM Mladost project it was a spare part for a machine on the production line. In development PPS CF works well for functional testing, and the serial part can later be metal.

What is the difference between PPS CF and CFF?

PPS CF is a polymer filled with chopped carbon fibers and is printed like a regular filament. CFF is a technology that lays a continuous fiber into the part, which gives much higher strength along the fiber. They are two different things and should not be confused.

Why combine several technologies instead of one?

Because each technology has its own strength. FFF is fast and cheap for iterations, SLA gives precision and a smooth surface, SLS gives strong functional parts, and CNC handles critical tolerances. In the 3Lateral project this combination cut the first iteration from 2 to 3 weeks to 2 to 3 days.

How can I check whether my company has a similar case?

The fastest way is to start with parts you wait long for or change often, in maintenance or in development. That is what the production analysis is for, where we go through your parts and processes together and see where 3D printing makes sense and where it does not.

Sources

Have a similar problem in production?

If you have a part you wait weeks for, or development held back by slow iterations, start with the production analysis. If you need support in choosing technology, profiles and procedures, see consulting. For metal parts there is also the free SLM DFAM Checker.